Copresco   Overnight Lite

Industry guru raises questions...

Spell-Checking Software: Is it Write or Wrong?

   A University of Pittsburgh study indicates that spell-check software may level the playing field between people with differing levels of language skills.
   In other words, we may all write and sound alike—and still be wrong.

Word Versus Wisdom

   In the study, undergraduate students were asked to proofread a one-page business letter—half of them using Microsoft Word, with its annoying red and green lines underlining potential errors. The other half did it the old fashioned way, they used their heads.
   Without grammar or spelling software, students with higher SAT verbal scores made, on average, five errors, compared with 12.3 errors for students with lower scores. Using the software, students with higher verbal scores reading the same page made, on average, 16 errors, compared with 17 errors for student with lower scores. In other words, the software made both groups look smart.

Shaky Results

    Spell-checking software is so ubiquitous that some have come to trust it too much. Grammar and spelling technology is meant to help writers and editors, not do their writing.
   The study found the software helped students find and correct errors in the letter, but, in some cases, they also changed phrases or sen-tences flagged by the software as grammatically suspicious, even though they were correct.
   For instance, the letter included a passage that said,“John Ames would be the best candidate. Ames has been in political rolls for many hears.”
   Software noticed the last “s” in “Ames” and suggested changing the verb from “has” to “have,” as if it were a plural. The spellchecker ignored “rolls,” which should have been “roles” and missed “hears,” which should have been “years.”
   Grammar and spelling software may never approach the complexity of the human mind, or replace the creativity of the human experience as expressed in words.
   Computer programs can suggest correct speech, but to follow them is to make all of us sound alike or appear brighter than we are—or allow more silly errors to pass through.
   According to a research study back in 1990, Macintosh users wrote at an 8th grade level and PC users wrote at a 12th grade level.

Less Distractions

   It seems that the Mac typographic format encouraged a simple sentence structure (and perhaps some alliteration) with childish vocabulary. PC users were not distracted by form and therefore concentrated on content.
   The original article appeared in Academic Computing in January 1990. An English instructor at the University of Delaware noted that freshmen using Macs seemed to be turning in essays that were not as well written as those done on the PC.

Good Looks—Less Substance

   When authors (writers, editors, etc.) deal with both form and content, there is a noticeable reduction in grammatical structure. They focus on what the text looks like rather than what it says.
   It makes no difference if it is a Mac or a PC—it is the preoccupation with format that diminishes attention to the details of the English language.
   And don’t get me started on calculators and the loss of basic math skills.
   This article by Frank J. Romano is reprinted with permission from the Digital Printing Report, Volume 10, No. 5, Digital Printing Council, Printing Industries of America, Inc., U.S.A.

Proofreading Tips

   Check out TechTopics No. 12 for another view on spellcheckers.
   Tips to avoid embarrassing and costly proofreading mistakes and blunders are included.
   The technical bulletin will be helpful to any person who creates documents for publication.
   You can get a free subscription to TechTopics by completing a form on the Copresco website.


Thanks for Your Help

   Thank you for responding to our survey regarding the physical condition of Overnight Lite when the postman brings it to your door.
   The consensus was that Lite, a self-mailer, stands up to Postal Service brutality quite well, but some rubbing of the digital image does occur.
   Full survey results can be found at the same website address you used to access the survey form last month.
   In Copresco’s spirit of ongoing testing and continuous improvement, we’ve printed this month’s Lite on dull instead of gloss-coated stock. Is this better? Worse? No difference?
   Please let us know by sending your comments via e-mail to the address at the bottom of this page.


Memorial Day

   Copresco will be closed Monday, May 31, for Memorial Day. Enjoy the start of the summer season.


Overnight Lite Main   Last Month   Next Month   This Month's On-Line Jokes

Home   Contact Us   What's New   Publications

Copyright © 2004 by Copresco All rights reserved.